June 19, 2008 / 10:43
What happens if a parent spanks their kid while smoking a cigarette?
June 19, 2008 / 10:47
If Mayor Miller had only banned children when he had the chance, this wouldn't be an issue.
June 20, 2008 / 10:26
If people are spanking their kids in 2008, maybe the gov't should step in.
Time outs, loss of televison privilages, and so many other forms of punishment work fine.
I don't think the Canadian gov't should support spanknig. It's also another law that can't really be enforced, like the smoking in cars thing. Still, they are coming from the right place, I think.
Spanking is lazy parenting. I wouldn't even spank a pet. Ever.
June 20, 2008 / 11:15
Haven't we all..? and as much as I don't like Miller, it was Jane Pitfield who wanted to ban people from the city.. namely the homeless.. what CHOICE we had this past election.. between two imcompetant LOSERS..
June 20, 2008 / 11:32
Pitfield should have been mayor. The people of Toronto voted and the majority got the loser they wanted.
If there’s a way to eliminate the homeless from the streets of Toronto, I’m all for it. I’ve previously stated my plan so I won’t bore you.
June 21, 2008 / 12:19
"Argie, shouldn't you be listening to AM640 or something?" Good one Jason. I thought the same thing, LOL! I think his solution was something like, put then all in jail or shoot them. Argue for Mayor!! Then rename Toronto New Berlin.
June 23, 2008 / 10:19
Mike: I didn’t suggest shooting them BUT now that you’ve brought it up – ya know its not a bad idea.
June 23, 2008 / 21:35
If "left wing" policies are responsible for the high number of homelessness, then how do you explain Alberta?
We're as far right as you go in Alberta and out here Conservative means "Centrist". The far right are the Wild Rose Party and their supporters that believe in "More Alberta, Less Ottawa".
On that subject Argie, ever notice you don't hear much whining from out here in West Canada? That's because in Ontario "right wing" means loud, obnoxious whiner. In Alberta it means a person that shuts up and gets out and does it.
June 24, 2008 / 09:21
Censoring certain comments so the thread doesn't even make sense anymore? And you want us to particiapate on Canadian Thinker? Come on now Freddie!
chortle.
June 24, 2008 / 09:21
Censoring certain comments so the thread doesn't even make sense anymore? And you want us to participate on Canadian Thinker? Come on now Freddie!
chortle.
June 25, 2008 / 09:29
And this is yet another reason why this generation is going to become spoiled thugs! The previous generations spanked their children as a form of consiquence. Let's face it, timeouts and sending them to thir room is supposed to be an alternative? Go ahead, ban the practice, but don't cry when our legal system is full of juvenile delinquints that have no idea what punishment is about.
June 25, 2008 / 14:10
Yeah because a kid that gets spanked will never grow up wanting to smack or harm someone else. No, they will never develop agression problems from their parents archaic parenting skills. In fact, if everyone would just go around smacking everyone else, the world would be a less violent place.
June 27, 2008 / 10:25
"Censoring certain comments so the thread doesn't even make sense anymore? And you want us to participate on Canadian Thinker? Come on now Freddie!"
Yeah Jason, I saw that too! Fred is just trying to stir the pot.........I think.
August 28, 2010 / 19:23
I must say that overall I am very taken with this site. It is apparent that you know you subject matter and you are passionate about it. I wish I had got your ability to write. I have bookmarked your site and look forward to more updates.
August 29, 2010 / 18:18
the written content on this publish is really 1 of the top substance that We have actually appear throughout. I really like your publish, I will appear back again to verify for new posts.
An anti-spanking bill that was passed by the Canadian Senate yesterday, definitely puts us on a slippery slope.
Site Feed
Recent Posts, Recent Comments & Categories
